Its a total waste of blood sample. At a guess, I'd say its accurate rarely. I know mine was negative when it should have been positive, and positive when it should have been negative.
Aj
I tested twice in one year because the IgM came back positive so they expected the IgG to turn positive and told me to come back in 3 months. I guess I was just worried that twice it come back positive-- as if it is indicating something??? It's either a false positive... or it is reading an antibody of one kind or another. I wish I knew what/which. Have you ever heard of positive IgMs leading to something or is it a total waste of blood sample.
Thanks for your responses!
I agree totally. The IgM is unreliable, and there aren't always answers as to why its giving someone a false reading.
You should stop having the IgM done. Its not even relevant for you anyway.
Why are you testing so often? Once a year should be fine.
Aj
the igm test is not reliable..i would honestly just go with the best testing which is the igg.but maybe someone else can give you the answers your looking for